Light-Based Food Preservation: Innovative Solutions for Extended Freshness

Discover how light-based technologies are used in food preservation to extend shelf life and maintain quality naturally and safely.

Blog insights

Discover how light-based technologies are used in food preservation to extend shelf life and maintain quality naturally and safely.

Consumers want processed foods that stay close to their original nutritional and sensory quality. Non-thermal methods can preserve these attributes better than conventional heat treatments. Pulsed light (PL), an emerging non-thermal technology, applies millisecond flashes of high-intensity, broad-spectrum white light to decontaminate food and packaging surfaces. It is being studied as an alternative to continuous ultraviolet treatments for both solid and liquid products. This review outlines the principles of PL, the mechanisms behind microbial inactivation, and current food applications. Key process parameters that must be optimized for reliable efficacy are also highlighted. PL shows promise for industrial adoption, yet technical hurdles—such as preventing localized overheating and improving light penetration and uniformity—remain. More data are also needed on how PL may influence food quality attributes.

Nonthermal technologies

Non-thermal technologies offer a processing route that keeps food temperatures lower than conventional pasteurization or sterilization. Traditional thermal treatments typically expose foods to 60 °C for minutes or near 100 °C for seconds, transferring enough energy to trigger reactions that can degrade vitamins, flavors, or pigments. By remaining below these temperatures, non-thermal techniques may better retain nutrients and sensory properties.

Pulsed light (PL) delivers rapid microbicidal flashes to food surfaces, equipment, and packaging. The terms "high-intensity broad-spectrum pulsed light" and "pulsed white light" are used interchangeably with PL.

Inert-gas flash lamps that emit intense, brief pulses of ultraviolet (UV) light were first used for microbial inactivation in Japan in the late 1970s. In 1988, PurePulse Technologies Inc. developed the PureBright® pulsed-light process to sterilize pharmaceuticals, medical devices, packaging, and water, demonstrating activity against bacteria (vegetative cells and spores), fungi, viruses, and protozoa. The food industry adopted the technology in 1996 after the U.S. Food and Drug Administration authorized its use for food production, processing, and handling.

Description of PL

Pulsed light (PL) delivers short, high-intensity flashes across a broad spectrum to inactivate microorganisms on food or packaging surfaces. Energy stored in a capacitor for fractions of a second is released as light within nanoseconds to milliseconds, amplifying power with minimal added energy (Dunn et al. 1995). A typical system contains adjustable xenon flash-lamp units, a power supply, and high-voltage connections that deliver rapid current pulses. As current crosses the lamp’s gas chamber, an intense flash is emitted, spanning roughly 100–1,100 nm: UV (100–400 nm), visible (400–700 nm), and near-infrared (700–1,100 nm). For food applications, lamps usually provide 1–20 flashes per second with surface energy densities of about 0.01–50 J cm⁻² (Barbosa-Cánovas et al. 1998).

Liquid Foods

Many fluids, such as water, are highly transparent to a broad range of wavelengths, including visible and UV light. Other liquids, such as sugar solutions and wines, exhibit more limited transparency. Increasing the number of solids reduces the depth to which UV radiation can penetrate. In an aqueous solution, lower transparency lessens the effectiveness of pulsed-light (PL) treatment. Liquids with high UV absorbance must be processed as a thin layer so that less radiation is absorbed by the liquid itself. This approach keeps UV absorption low, increasing the likelihood that bacteria receive a lethal dose. The absorbance of clarified fresh juices and pulpy juices varies considerably. Clarified apple juice has low absorbance, with absorption coefficients around 11 cm⁻¹, whereas orange juice can reach values close to 50 cm⁻¹. A positive correlation between vitamin C content and the absorption coefficient of clear apple juices has been observed.

Conclusions

PL is a novel non-thermal technology that can inactivate pathogenic and spoilage microorganisms on foods. Significant microbial reductions in short treatment times, low energy demand, absence of residual compounds, and processing flexibility are among its main advantages. The method is clearly efficient for microbial inactivation in vitro, yet its potential for real foods is still under investigation. Further studies are needed to evaluate PL effects on food properties beyond safety and spoilage. Optimizing critical process factors is necessary to achieve target inactivation levels for specific foods without compromising quality. Equipment offering better penetration and short treatment times must be designed for commercial use, and the industrial applicability of PL should be compared with other non-thermal or conventional thermal processes.

References
  • Anderson, J. G., Rowan, N. J., MacGregor, S. J., Fouracre, R. A., & Farish, O. (2000). Inactivation of food-borne enteropathogenic bacteria and spoilage fungi using pulsed-light. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, 28(1), 83–88. doi:10.1109/27.842870.
  • U.S. FDA Food Safety Overview - Link
  • WHO Food Safety Fact Sheets - Link
  • Baka, M., Mercier, J., Corcruff, R., Castaigne, F., & Arul, J. (1999). Photochemical treatment to improve the storability of fresh strawberries. Journal of Food Science, 64, 1068–1072. doi:10.1111/j.1365–2621.1999.tb12284.x.
  • Barbosa-Canovas, G. V., Pothakamury, U. R., Palou, E., & Swanson, B. G. (1998). Nonthermal Preservation of Foods, pp. 139–161. New York: Marcel Dekker.
  • Barka, E. A. (2001). Protective enzymes against reactive oxygen species during ripening of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) fruits respond to low doses of UV-C. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 28, 785–791.
  • Bialka, K. L., & Demirci, A. (2007). Decontamination of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella enterica on blueberries using ozone and pulsed UV-light. Journal of Food Science, 72(9), 391–396. doi:10.1111/j.1750–3841.2007.00517.x.
  • Bialka, K. I., & Demirci, A. (2008). Efficacy of pulsed UV-light for the decontamination of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella enterica on raspberries and strawberries. Journal of Food Science, 73(0), 1–7.
  • Bialka, K. I., Demirci, A., & Purl, V. M. (2008). Modeling the inactivation of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella enterica on raspberries and strawberries after exposure to ozone or pulsed UV-light. Journal of Food Engineering, 85(3), 444–449. doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2007.08.007.
  • Bintsis, T., Litopoulou-Tzanetaki, E., & Robinson, R. (2000). Existing and potential applications of ultraviolet light in the food industry — a critical review. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 80, 637–645. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097–0010(20000501)80:6<637::aid-jsfa603>3.0.CO;2–1.
  • Cantos, E., Espin, J. C., & Tomas-Barberan, F. A. (2002). Postharvest stilbene enrichment of red and white table grape berries by short UVC pulses. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 50, 6322–6329. doi:10.1021/jf020562x.
  • Chung, S. Y., Yang, W., & Krishnamurthy, K. (2008). Impact of pulsed UV light on peanut allergens in extracts and liquid peanut butter. Journal of Food Science, 73(5), 400–404. doi:10.1111/j.1750-3841.2008.00784.x.
  • Dhallewin, G., Schirra, M., Manueddu, E., Piga, A., & Ben-Yehoshua, S. (1999). Scoparone and scopoletin accumulation and UV-C-induced resistance to postharvest decay in oranges as affected by harvest date. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 124, 702–707.
  • Dong, Y. H., Mitra, D., Kootstra, A., Lister, C., & Lancaster, J. (1995). Postharvest enhancement of skin color in 'Royal Gala' apple. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 120, 95–100.
  • Dunn, J. (1996). Pulsed light and pulsed electric field treatments for foods and eggs. Poultry Science, 75(9), 1133–1136.
  • Dunn, J., Bushnell, A., Ott, T., & Clark, W. (1997). Pulsed white-light food processing. Cereal Foods World, 42, 510–515.
  • Dunn, J. E., Clark, R. W., Asmus, J. F., Pearlman, J. S., Boyer, K., Painchaud, F., et al. (1989). Methods for preservation of foodstuffs. US Patent 4871559.
  • Dunn, J. E., Clark, R. W., Asmus, J. F., Pearlman, J. S., Boyer, K., Painchaud, F., et al. (1991). Methods for preservation of foodstuffs. US Patent 5034235.
  • El Ghaouth, A., Wilson, C. L., & Callahan, A. M. (2003). UV-C-induced chitinase, β-1,3-glucanase, and phenylalanine ammonia-lyase in peach fruit. Phytopathology, 93, 349–355. doi:10.1094/PHYTO.2003.93.3.349.
  • Elmnasser, N., Guillou, S., Leroi, F., Orange, N., Bakhrouf, A., & Federighi, M. (2007). Pulsed-light technology as a novel food decontamination method: A review. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 53, 813–821. doi:10.1139/W07-042.
  • Stay Updated on LED Innovations

    Thank you for subscribing.
    Submission failed. Please try again.
    image of treatment in session at a wellness center

    Explore the latest in LED therapy

    No items found.